Posted under Tags
The bulk update request #151 has been rejected.
create implication (mario_(series)) -> (nintendo)
create implication (the_legend_of_zelda) -> (nintendo)
create implication (metroid) -> (nintendo)
create implication (doubutsu_no_mori) -> (nintendo)
create implication (splatoon(series)) -> (nintendo)
These are different IP's were created by, and currently owned by Nintendo. It would make sense to group these together under the Nintendo tag.
Updated
The bulk update request #151 (forum #5568) has been rejected by @Derpy_Hooves_Mx.
DanbooruBot said:
The bulk update request #151 (forum #5568) has been rejected by @Derpy_Hooves_Mx.
I'm just curious as to why. I thought this could've expanded to other companies that own various IP's like Disney, Nickelodeon, or Sega.
Drawn2Cunny said:
I'm just curious as to why. I thought this could've expanded to other companies that own various IP's like Disney, Nickelodeon, or Sega.
I've got nothing to do with the approval process, but I'd guess it doesn't help that you apparently put parentheses around every tag? They're not tags that actually exist, as written.
Zohashi said:
I've got nothing to do with the approval process, but I'd guess it doesn't help that you apparently put parentheses around every tag? They're not tags that actually exist, as written.
Ahh, that makes sense. I somehow thought I needed to format the tags that way. Should I try requesting this again with proper formatting, or would that just be spam?
If you have not received a mod reply giving a different reason, and you have received a totally logical formatting based reason, I would think that it would be fine to resubmit, fixing the formatting issue. Note that I'm also a non-mod voice here.
i would say: the implication is correct, but the tag should be "nintendo" and not "(nintendo)"