Upload Feedback Thread

Posted under General

Post here if you want to know why your uploads got deleted.
But before you start a flamewar, keep in mind that there are many threads which may answer your question. If not or if you are still unsure, feel free to ask your question.

And don´t start to flood this thread with links to images just because you have some personal issues with their content or their reason why they got deleted.

Updated by DontTouchMyCogs

I haven't had this image deleted or anything, at least not yet, but I would appreciate some help in making the rules possible to follow. I just posted post #346734 and it said a copyright tag is required. That's all fine and good, but it already has one, it's vampire_(game). Problem is, that's listed as a "general" tag and not a "copyright" tag, and the system won't let me fix it. If you could please grant me whatever permission I need, I'd love to be able to clean up this and other miscategorized tags. Thank you.

Updated

Hi is it okay if Trooper201 artist work is allowed here.

I mean yes many mighty b characters do have boobs but that's his type of style yes he makes OC's but to clarify he reserves the rights and it isn't fair if any content of his gets removed I know it maybe not fits a criteria but not all work of his are that bad.

He has made some lolis for say as well.

Trooper201 said:

Hi is it okay if Trooper201 artist work is allowed here.

I mean yes many mighty b characters do have boobs but that's his type of style yes he makes OC's but to clarify he reserves the rights and it isn't fair if any content of his gets removed I know it maybe not fits a criteria but not all work of his are that bad.

He has made some lolis for say as well.

tbh you can post any drawn porn with in reason that you want however only the loli, shota, cub, toddler and young teen (not old teen like 15 16 17 18) will get approved. any thing that doesnt qualify will simply be put in the deleted section which isnt actually deleted nor has an expiration date its just mean its hidden away but you and any one that come to your profile can view it. well except for relistic 3d

Updated

Trooper201 said:
Hi is it okay if Trooper201 artist work is allowed here.
I mean yes many mighty b characters do have boobs
but that's his type of style

Why are you talking about yourself in the 3rd person?

Shouldn't you be saying "that's my type of style" ?

yes he makes OC's
but to clarify he reserves the rights
and it isn't fair if any content of his gets removed

"he" instead of "I" again... wut?

Anywho, to answer: lots of artists have had their content removed because it didn't fall within "underage character" boundaries.

For example, this piece by Tram Pararam which Nigel uploaded 3 months ago for some reason https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/338581

It would actually be unfair to other artists (like Tram) who had their work deleted here if you uploaded similar work and the mods didn't delete it.

I know it maybe not fits a criteria but not all work of his are that bad.

He has made some lolis for say as well.

It's not so much that non-loli stuff is bad (I for example am a huge fan of various older women that Pookie draws, which I add to Paheal instead of here) as much as it is just fitting the theme of the sight.

There's lots of great furry stuff on e621 and anime stuff on gelbooru which doesn't fit here since it lacks either a loli or a shota in it.

My largest confusion with deciding which of your stuff to add here is "is the chest flat enough" because while we have "oppai loli" here, it's become very difficult to judge what that is (at least for me)

So for the most part I've been looking for stuff of yours which is preteen/flatchested so it gets accepted because I don't need any more conflict about line-drawing in the busty teens.

DontTouchMyCogs said:
you can post any drawn porn you want however only the loli, shota, cub, toddler and young teen (not old teen like 15 16 17 18) will get approved.

When it comes to Colby/Trooper's art, even though I have a tendency to favor uploading uncensored art where possible (I'll add censored if it's the only version I can find of the image, of course) in this case I wonder if maybe we should just add the censored ones?

Colby draws the Mighty Bee lolis pretty faithfully to their in-show appearance EXCEPT for tacking on the giant oppai in a lot of them: however on Pixiv he uploads the uncensored ones in a series below ones where has drawn overtop of the oppai with black censor scribbles.

That actually makes them look a lot more genuine-loli and might be a better match for here?

For example: https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/79021367

the first one looks legit-loli since the bar allows you to imagine her flatchested, while the 2nd one shows the oppai addition which could anger the mods, so I'd prob feel more comfortable adding the 1st than the 2nd

to begin with I'm prob gonna prioritize the stuff which he's drawn flatchested AND uncensored though, such as https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/84387340 where the only thing that's giant is the areolae

Updated

i was never angry that was all dampfunel tbh. to mr oppai loli just doesnt look like loli when tits are added. but thats just me.

DontTouchMyCogs said:
to mr oppai loli just doesnt look like loli when tits are added. but thats just me.

It doesn't make them 'more' loli or anything, but you can still weigh other characteristics and recognize they're loli despite tits.

Like for example this piece you uploaded 2 months ago https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/342016

Maggie is obviously more mature-looking than not only her toddler self but even her older sister Lisa, yet she clearly still has preteen size/proportions in everything but the inflated bust.

tyc said:

It doesn't make them 'more' loli or anything, but you can still weigh other characteristics and recognize they're loli despite tits.

Like for example this piece you uploaded 2 months ago https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/342016

Maggie is obviously more mature-looking than not only her toddler self but even her older sister Lisa, yet she clearly still has preteen size/proportions in everything but the inflated bust.

i didnt post that i approved it by acident. sometime i just dont pay attention to what im approving. that one slipped through.

Also the reason I’m not as posting too much mighty b and that is I’m actually doing what is best not overloading too much works in the ATF booru site.

Also apparently yes most Loli’s are Oppai Loli not sure why that was a habit in my works and yes if your not satisfied I’ll look oneday onto recreating all mighty b characters into flat chested in future. But yes the Oppai loli is something I created in form of other styling.

But I’ll see oneday of remaking flat cheating in the distant future.

Trooper201 said:

Also the reason I’m not as posting too much mighty b and that is I’m actually doing what is best not overloading too much works in the ATF booru site.

Also apparently yes most Loli’s are Oppai Loli not sure why that was a habit in my works and yes if your not satisfied I’ll look oneday onto recreating all mighty b characters into flat chested in future. But yes the Oppai loli is something I created in form of other styling.

But I’ll see oneday of remaking flat cheating in the distant future.

did one for you
https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/352759

Trooper201 said:
I’ll look oneday onto recreating all mighty b characters into flat chested in future
I’ll see oneday of remaking flat cheating in the distant future.

This will improve you as an artist for sure, it requires more skill to draw a subtle flat chest IMO.

tyc said:

This will improve you as an artist for sure, it requires more skill to draw a subtle flat chest IMO.

bah! flat cheats is easy drawing tits imo is more difficult.

DontTouchMyCogs said:

bah! flat cheats is easy drawing tits imo is more difficult.

maybe drawing realistic breasts is more difficult, but in comparison to cartoonish ones, realistic flat chests are harder

tyc said:

maybe drawing realistic breasts is more difficult, but in comparison to cartoonish ones, realistic flat chests are harder

I decided that here at ATF my works not seen on pixiv will be posted loli while on pixiv and rule34xxx are to be posted oppai most of them.

Specially to respect the terms here at atf it’s best my loli versions most including mighty b forms will be placed here as well.

So I decided to have this new term issued in.

Trooper201 said:

I decided that here at ATF my works not seen on pixiv will be posted loli while on pixiv and rule34xxx are to be posted oppai most of them.

Specially to respect the terms here at atf it’s best my loli versions most including mighty b forms will be placed here as well.

So I decided to have this new term issued in.

like i said you can post what you want it just wont get approved lol.

DontTouchMyCogs said:

like i said you can post what you want it just wont get approved lol.

best not to encourage, it still takes up place on the servers and clutters the waiting list for mods' limited time
the second spend rejecting boobies is a second not spent approving DFC

tyc said:

best not to encourage, it still takes up place on the servers and clutters the waiting list for mods' limited time
the second spend rejecting boobies is a second not spent approving DFC

true. but... that doesn't stop you lol. thats why i said that.

DontTouchMyCogs said:

true. but... that doesn't stop you lol. thats why i said that.

getting banned and realizing that boobies stay in limbo longer than DFC has mostly steered my away save for s/s stuff

tyc said:

getting banned and realizing that boobies stay in limbo longer than DFC has mostly steered my away save for s/s stuff

i see

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/374661?q=user%3ATrooper201

Right so I posted work that has no oppai on Millie and for ATF Booru all works posted here are loli multiverse

The Oppai is for rule34xxx but due to issues circumstances beyond control having difficulty at the moment with them,

I still have to souse out the plan for a new account to xbooru and that and specially I have Baraag and Pixiv works to post.

I will be doing loli and oppai verse on any of my works I decided loli multiverse can remain on atf.

The picture is Millie wearing her black bra and thong.

Seems my picture was neglected but could be the quality maybe I need to try again brighter next time with Millie in loli format this is literally frustrating as I’m trying to compete against Moxxi.

Trooper201 said:

Seems my picture was neglected but could be the quality maybe I need to try again brighter next time with Millie in loli format this is literally frustrating as I’m trying to compete against Moxxi.

nah i must have missed that one. its approved. your art is very good it just most of it got rejected due to the boobs.

junk719junk said:

I'm teetering on the fence on the second one. I really wished it wasn't censored... definitely does not fit "little_girl" tag, but young teen maybe. It felled because not approved in 3 days. It could be appealed... really wished it wasn't censored...

yeah censoring defeats the purpose of the image imo but thats the law in japan or other reason i wont go in to lol.

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/36676 seems like it's drawn by the same artist so I tagged 342674 as the parent

neither had artist rags but I notice this one w/ the piercings that Iratu added 6 years ago has "rs.10" on her leg

Figure I'd go with that being the artist tag, though I expect "10" might possibly refer to the image being drawn in 2010.

Trying to compile a list of initials so we can check when we see stuff like "RS" to figure out what longer names it might stand for and visually compare the signatures.

DontTouchMyCogs said:
censoring defeats the purpose of the image imo

Even without the blur there's still a towel in the way so it's cameltoe... is it common to censor cameltoe in Japan too? Maybe just due to this level of translucency... bath towels usually can't be seen through like that, makes me wonder if she's drying herself with a sheet?

Plenty erotic about this even if you only showed her from the left-hand pinky finger and above though... her wide face and narrow shoulders scream neoteny to me. The chest isn't really that much larger than Solar's add at https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/327076 is it?

Paradise_Ayu said:

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/382556
Why? :(

5 disapprovals... I don't even think I personally disapprove it. I just axed it when it reached 5. It's one of those borderline images. It's not only the boobs which really are not that large, she doesn't look young in the face or thighs. Censorship doesn't help your cause neither. It might account for the 3 "did not like enough to approve". The tags suck too, "green_hair" and "blue_hair"? Where the hell is the "animal_print"? I'm not really searching for "blue_sleeves" or "virtual_youtuber". Looks like a copy and paste job on the tags. There's not much there that hits people's specific fetishes, it's pretty vanilla stuff. The artist does not even have a large body of work here. That's just what I can come up with why your post felled. It could have passed on a different day, but it's in the realm of an "either/or". Try appealing it and make a decent argument.

DontTouchMyCogs said:

mainly cause the super break your neck tits women are the main focus i approved a few though

"main focus"

well, if the shota is still getting dommed by thicc babes, then it should count lol

if the shota was just a background character I could understand, but in these pics they're still given focus, plus that's just Kloah's thing

Updated

Horny111111z said:

"main focus"

well, if the shota is still getting dommed by thicc babes, then it should count lol

if the shota was just a background character I could understand, but in these pics they're still given focus, plus that's just Kloah's thing

im just doing what the rule state. plus the the modque has such a terrible preview window. if it were my booru i would just let all ages in. but its not im just a helper here.

Horny111111z said:

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383881

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383882

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383886

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383888

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383891

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383898

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383900

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383902

Why were these images rejected? They seem fine to me, guess the mods are super nitpicky

Let's see if I can split the hairs for you.

First of all, mods can get nitpicky, but at the same time it only takes ONE mod to approve an image. Deletions happens when an image is unapproved in three days, is proven to be a duplicate, is a gross violation of the rules, or has 5 or more disapprovals before the 3 day approval window. The latter is done to keep the modqueue from being cluttered (images with 5 disapprovals are very rarely approved).

Getting 5 disapprovals, but is arguably within the rules, is an indication that your image is unpopular. When you post many images at once that are unpopular, some mods just click any reason to disapprove because they are disappoving images en masse. They may click "breaks the rules" when they should be clicking "no interest".

"Straight_shota" with large breasted mature women in my opinion is not popular. It certainly isn't popular with pure lolicons since there's not much there for them. Shotacons are split since some of them are into yaoi shota or "sholicon". Large breasted mature women do not have much of a following here, and those who are interested in it usually go to a different site for that. That doesn't mean that "straight_shota" doesn't have a following here, it's just that it needs help to be accepted here.

Let's look at some of the post you made:

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383881
This image lacks lewdness. It doesn't mean that all posts need to be lewd... but it does help. In fact, this image is only mildly suggest and pretty vanilla. Tags would help as would for more of your posts. You got the artist and nothing else. Tagging the characters/copyright "palutena"/"kid_icarus" or "angel_(actraiser_renaissance)" might add to the appeal of this image. Also, having sufficient tags shows you care about what you are posting and someone else doesn't have to go back and tag it.

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383886 this image I like to refer to as a "ay caramba". It reminds me of an image I seen once where Marge and Homer Simpson are having sex and in the corner, very small, is Bart Simpson saying "aye caramba". The shota adds nothing to the image other than being a placeholder for the tag "shota" to claim that it is relevant here. You might as well take any image and photoshop Bart Simpson in the corner saying "ay caramba" to make it relevant to this site.

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383888
Another "ay caramba" but worse. The... possibly shota is on the far left foreground, blurry, and has his head cut off. He is not the focus of this image... LITERALLY. You easily crop him out and have an image of old cows being milked.

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383891
Shota hands? Come on man!

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/381905
Remember that the teen rule applies to shota. This one is pretty borderline. Also who the hell is that guy? I recognize the gardevoirs around him. Some OC? If I was into teenaged shota, do I want this pokemon fanart original character that doesn't even show the goods? I hope the gardevoirs decide to eat him instead of fuck him.

Anyway, that's just a bit of my insight. If you still feel like some images deserve a second look, feel free to appeal them.

and just fyi im being very generous on approving some of these images. cause i was on the other end of the stick and know what its like to have my post rejected.

almost every one of these the focus is on the adult woman not the shota.

DontTouchMyCogs said:
mainly cause the super break your neck tits women are the main focus i approved a few though

unless the shota is out of frame I think her being the "main" focus is sort of a subjective thing...

I mean what are we going based on? if it was size difference that would exclude a LOT of artwork because adults are generally the larger-depicted parter

I'd agree with deleting https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383888 for example since the shota's head is cut off plus he's blurry and out of focus, as well as https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383891 since it's just hands and you need a lot of context (her untranslated dialogue, realizing they're tiny hands) to know it's a shota...

but https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383881 seems perfectly okay: he's in focus, can see his face, he's reacting to her, etc ... how is this not lewd? this is way more than 'mildly' suggestive IMO. It's not merely a blush: her tits are right in his face, he knee is edging towards his groin, he's sweating...

I hope the appeal for https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383902 gets accepted since you can see his face reaction to the women

"Straight_shota" with large breasted mature women in my opinion is not popular.
It certainly isn't popular with pure lolicons since there's not much there for them

and solo shota or yaoi shota wouldn't be popular with lolicons either... not seeing your point
nor would loli+loli yuri be popular amongst shota+shota fujoshi fans

shotacons are split since some of them are into yaoi shota or "sholicon". Large breasted mature women do not have much of a following here

How are you assessing that exactly? Maybe they're just less vocal? I'm certainly into all types.

this image I like to refer to as a "ay caramba".

can I make this a meta tag for this and others? :)

That said, there is a very erotic component IMO to a shota or loli being present in a serious voyeuristic sense even if they aren't overtly doing something lewd themselves.

Not in the sense of Bart just reacting like that, but where they seem aroused/curious IMO is where there's something of value.

tyc said:

unless the shota is out of frame I think her being the "main" focus is sort of a subjective thing...

I mean what are we going based on? if it was size difference that would exclude a LOT of artwork because adults are generally the larger-depicted parter

I'd agree with deleting https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383888 for example since the shota's head is cut off plus he's blurry and out of focus, as well as https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383891 since it's just hands and you need a lot of context (her untranslated dialogue, realizing they're tiny hands) to know it's a shota...

but https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383881 seems perfectly okay: he's in focus, can see his face, he's reacting to her, etc ... how is this not lewd? this is way more than 'mildly' suggestive IMO. It's not merely a blush: her tits are right in his face, he knee is edging towards his groin, he's sweating...

I hope the appeal for https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/383902 gets accepted since you can see his face reaction to the women

and solo shota or yaoi shota wouldn't be popular with lolicons either... not seeing your point
nor would loli+loli yuri be popular amongst shota+shota fujoshi fans

How are you assessing that exactly? Maybe they're just less vocal? I'm certainly into all types.

can I make this a meta tag for this and others? :)

That said, there is a very erotic component IMO to a shota or loli being present in a serious voyeuristic sense even if they aren't overtly doing something lewd themselves.

Not in the sense of Bart just reacting like that, but where they seem aroused/curious IMO is where there's something of value.

please optimize your sentences. every one has a different opinion i personally dont really like the artist work but i approve what counts. some of the shotas just look like shorter adults to me. and the one that are just there but not doing any thing just dont count imo. yeah i approve safe images that i like but in this case the focus is the boobs. and anime boobs that could end some one if they fell on someone just isnt my thing lol.

Hey tyc

This is supposed to be an "upload feedback" thread, not an "upload feedback feedback" thread. In fact, this isn't the appeal thread either, so why are you asking for appeals as well?

Horny111111z asked for feedback on his posts. Both DontTouchMyCogs and I responded with constructive feedback... a mod and an admin... and within 24 hours. I think that's a pretty good responce. Then you jump in a few days later. Did you also offer feedback as a builder? No, you just shitted all over our feedback... that's pretty dickish.

Go ahead and stack this on the rest of your warnings. This thread is only for asking and offering feedback for uploads. Please refrain from criticizing feedback from others.

junk719junk said:

Hey tyc

This is supposed to be an "upload feedback" thread, not an "upload feedback feedback" thread. In fact, this isn't the appeal thread either, so why are you asking for appeals as well?

Horny111111z asked for feedback on his posts. Both DontTouchMyCogs and I responded with constructive feedback... a mod and an admin... and within 24 hours. I think that's a pretty good responce. Then you jump in a few days later. Did you also offer feedback as a builder? No, you just shitted all over our feedback... that's pretty dickish.

Go ahead and stack this on the rest of your warnings. This thread is only for asking and offering feedback for uploads. Please refrain from criticizing feedback from others.

my feedback: a builder, who have added a new character, artist or source should edit this tag into the correct group!

namekianer said:
my feedback: a builder, who have added a new character, artist or source should edit this tag into the correct group!

by 'source' I figure you mean 'copyright' and I agree. A lot of people haven't and I spend a lot of time grouping them in other posts, so if I do occasionally miss some I've more than compensated :)

ArtLiberty20 said:

God this site is so arbitrary. What is wrong with this?
https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/390644?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3AArtLiberty20

Not a mod but...

I look at that one, and my thoughts go to "what is lolicon about it?"

Two animal characters standing/hovering around with nothing sexual, and nothing that makes them look young at all.

The one furry that is sexually nude is draw way, way out of the age range for lolicon.

Not a bad image, but IMHO nothing that makes it on-topic for this site.

Leortha said:

Not a mod but...

I look at that one, and my thoughts go to "what is lolicon about it?"

Two animal characters standing/hovering around with nothing sexual, and nothing that makes them look young at all.

The one furry that is sexually nude is draw way, way out of the age range for lolicon.

Not a bad image, but IMHO nothing that makes it on-topic for this site.

I thought this site was for loli, shota and furry.

ArtLiberty20 said:

I thought this site was for loli, shota and furry.

it is but the focus is the adult female and spyro is just there. staring at it.

Stressing again that I'm not a mod. I'm just another user giving my opinion here.

https://booru.allthefallen.moe/wiki_pages/howto%3Aupload

Looking at the "Generally accepted" section, it refers to "cub (furry)", not straight up "furry". The term "cub" in this context is the loli/shota equivalent for furry. So this is not a site for all furry content, but rather for young-looking furry content. There can be debate about whether or not a given image would count as "cub", just like there is debate on what is loli. But the site itself is not intended for general furry content.

ArtLiberty20 said:

I thought this site was for loli, shota and furry.

This site is for loli, shota, and cub. Furry is allowed, but must still contain loli, shota, and/or cub content.

Hello,
This is my first upload so please tell me if I did anything wrong.
https://booru.allthefallen.moe/posts/426466?q=user%3Ano-non
This post got flagged as Breaks Rules, but I did not see anything about scat being against the rules, and this is just the original image (not an edit), the censored one is already uploaded here as the parent.

Can someone please clarify in what way the image breaks the rules?

Thank you,
No-Non

Non-mod opinion here. My guess is that it has nothing to do with the scat. Rather it's an issue of the lack of an obvious loli in the image. Either of the people in the image might be a loli. Maybe. But neither is obviously a loli.

Leortha said:

Non-mod opinion here. My guess is that it has nothing to do with the scat. Rather it's an issue of the lack of an obvious loli in the image. Either of the people in the image might be a loli. Maybe. But neither is obviously a loli.

Hello Leortha, it is actually a shota in the image, and the parent image was approved so I cannot image there should be any issue with the subject of the image.

1