[REJECTED] Tag implication: anal_orgasm -> hands-free

Posted under Tags

jay19 said:

What? A person can use hands to stimulate the anus of another person. In which case it wouldn't be hands-free

It's not something literal. If there's no direct stimulation of the genitals, it's a hands-free orgasm.
In this case the stimulated part would be the anus. So still a hands-free. It's not spontaneous either because the body is being stimulated somehow.

leodrack said:

It's not something literal. If there's no direct stimulation of the genitals, it's a hands-free orgasm.
In this case the stimulated part would be the anus. So still a hands-free. It's not spontaneous either because the body is being stimulated somehow.

I can simulate the anus by using hands, a dildo or another dick. Hands-free can be applied to a broad range of terms. While anal orgasm is specific. Both tags could apply in anal orgasms while hands free could be used for MANY OTHER SITUATIONS! The answer here is no!

jay19 said:

I can simulate the anus by using hands, a dildo or another dick. Hands-free can be applied to a broad range of terms. While anal orgasm is specific. Both tags could apply in anal orgasms while hands free could be used for MANY OTHER SITUATIONS! The answer here is no!

The tag, however, is used in many cases where "anal_orgasm" applies. Only 4% of the uploads don't have "hands-free" along "anal_orgasm". I think it's safe to assume these two belong together. Anal_orgasm implies that the orgasm is a result of anal, and not stimulation on the penis directly (in which case it wouldn't be hands-free). While technically it's not possible to verify whether the orgasm is a result of anal, while someone is also giving a handjob, it's silly to assume the artist intended either since you cannot see it.

reading the whole conversation made me think there are some doctors discussing about this specific topic, while doing their job with bloody hands on a human... xD

1