[REJECTED] Tag implication: handsfree_ejaculation -> hands-free

Posted under Tags

The tag implication #8821 handsfree_ejaculation -> hands-free has been rejected.

Reason: A handsfree_ejaculation directly implies into a hands-free orgasm (it's even in the name)

EDIT: This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The tag implication handsfree_ejaculation -> hands-free (forum #410) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Updated by DanbooruBot

jay19 said:

Right but other things can be hands-free besides ejaculations. Like Hands-free remote
Hands-free eating etc etc. Just making it hands-free isn't good enough

Hands-free is just a term. Females can still cum hands-free if their anus are sensible enough. And the majority of them don't squirt nor ejaculate when they orgasm. If you think it's better to convert to handsfree_orgasm, it's fine

1